@tangle/complex-set
A strategy for tracking a set over time, when it matters when a certain thing was added to a Set, and when it was removed
Example Usage
const ComplexSet = require('@tangle/complex-set')
const input = {
add: [
{ id: '@ben', seq: 25 },
{ id: '@cherese', seq: 2 }
]
}
strategy.mapFromInput(input, [strategy.identity()])
// => {
// '@ben': { 25: 1 },
// 'cherese: { 2: 1 }
// }The raw transformations look like this:
{
[id]: {
[seq]: state
}
}where
idString - the thing being added / removed from the setseqInteger - some Integer which is a unique representation of when. (e.g. logical clock or clock wall time). Must be >= 0stateInteger - an Integer representing whether it was an add or remove.state > 0- addstate <= 0- remove
However there are convenience methods for making it easier to work with these.
API
ComplexSet(idPattern) => complexSet
Instantiates a strategy, complexSet.
idPatternString (optional)- a pattern which is converted into a regexp validating the
idfield - e.g.
'^@\w+$'would make only ids like@mixmixvalid - default:
'^.+$'
- a pattern which is converted into a regexp validating the
complexSet.isValid(T) => Boolean
complexSet.schema
Access the JSON shcema that isValid was built with.
complexSet.concat(A, B) => C
complexSet.identity() => I
returns "identity transformation"
complexSet.mapFromInput(input, currentTips) => T
Takes a current transformation state, currentTips, an array of Ts that are the
tips of the graph, along with a human friendly (descriptive) input
and returns a transformation T which satisfies the
change requested in `input.
Format of input:
{
add: [{ id: Id, seq: Integer }, ... ]
remove: [{ id: Id, seq: Integer }, ... ]
}where:
idis a unique identifier for something being added.Idmust pass theidPatternvalidator
seqis a "sequence", some whole number which represents a position in time- this could be a vector clock, or
- a wall clock (UTC time)
You can provide EITHER add / remove OR both.
complexSet.mapToOutput(T) => t
Takes a transformation T and returns an output state t, which is more
"human readable"
Format of output t:
{
Id: [Interval],
}A series of Intervals is computed for each Id from all the add and remove
events, and these are ordered lowest to highest in terms of sequence.
Intervals will be of form:
{ start: Integer, end: Integer }- a "closed" interval{ start: Integer, end: null }- an "open" interval
- this will only ever occur as the last interval in a series
An Example transformation
When users were added / removed as permitted authors for an ssb-record.
// an example of a transformation
T = {
// an example set where each @user was permitted at different intervals
'@cherese': {
200: 1, // seq=200, state=1=add
1000: -1 // seq=1000, state=-1=remove
},
'@ben': {
1000: 1, // seq=1000, state=1=add
1100: 2, // seq=1100, state=2=add
2000: -1 // seq=2000, state=-1=remove
},
'@mix': {
300: -1 // seq=300, state=-1=remove
}
}
// the reified state of that transformation
mapToOutput(T) = {
'@cherese': [{ start: 200, end: 1000 }],
'@ben': [{ start: 1000, end: 2000 }], // note how 1100 wasnt added
// note @mix is not here
// ids with no "add" states are ignored
}simpleSet.isConflict() => False
simpleSet.isValidMerge() => True
simpleSet.merge(graph, mergeNode, field) => T
where:
graphis a@tangle/graphinstancemergeNodeis the proposed merge-nodefieldString contains the the data fieldsnode.data[field]